Picture in your mind the skyline of downtown Toronto. There's the
CN Tower, of course, and the 72-floor First Canadian Place, the
city's tallest skyscraper. Cascading from there are the assorted
banks and hotels and insurance towers.
Now, use your imagination to construct some new buildings,
these ones reaching three, four and five times higher than the
others. Top it all off with a skyscraper one mile high (three
times as high as the CN Tower).
Sound fanciful? It did 30 years ago when Frank Lloyd Wright
proposed the first mile-high building.
But not today. We are now said to be entering the age of the
superskyscraper, with tall buildings poised to take a giant new
leap into the sky. Skyscrapers approaching the mile mark may
still be awhile off, but there are proposals now for
megastructures soaring 900 m -- twice as high as the world's
tallest building, the 110-story Sears Tower in Chicago.
Suppose that you were asked to erect such a building. How
would you do it? What are the obstacles you'd face? What
materials would you use? And where would you put it?
Building a superskyscraper, the first thing you would need is
a considerable slice of real estate. Tall buildings require a
large base to support their load and keep them stable. In
general, the height of a building should be six times its base,
so, for a skyscraper 900-m tall, you'd need a base of 150 square
m.
That much space is hard to come by in, say, downtown
Toronto, forcing you to look for an undeveloped area, perhaps the
Don Valley ravine, next to the Science Centre. Bear in mind
though that the Don Valley is overlain by loose sand and silt,
and tall buildings must stand on firm ground, or else risk the
fate of edifices like the Empress Hotel in Victoria. This grand
dowager, completed in 1908, long before the science of soil
mechanics, has since found herself slowly sinking into the soft
clay.
Soil analysis is especially critical in facing the threat of
earthquakes. The Japanese have learned many times the hard way
what happens when an earth tremor shakes a high-rise constructed
on soft, wet sand. The quake's enormous energy severs the loose
connections between the individual grains, turning the ground
into quicksand in just seconds and swallowing up the building. .
Engineers have actually built machines that condense loose
ground. One machine pounds the earth with huge hammers. Another
plunges a large vibrating probe into the ground, like a blender
in a milk shake, stirring up the sand so that its structure
collapses and the individuals grains fall closer together.
Anchoring a skyscraper in the Don Valley would best be solved
by driving long steel piles down through the sand and silt into
the underlying hard clay till. Or, if the clay till lies too far
underground, inserting more piles into the sand. The friction
between sand and so much steel would then be sufficient to hold
the concrete foundation above in place.
The next obstacle in erecting a superskyscraper, and perhaps
the biggest one, is wind. Tall buildings actually sway in the
breeze, in much the same way that a diving board bends under the
weight of a diver.
Building an edifice that doesn't topple over in the wind is
easy enough. The real challenge is keeping the structure so stiff
that it doesn't swing too far, cracking partitions, shattering
windows and making the upper occupants seasick. As a rule, the
top of skyscraper should never drift more than 1/400 of its
height at a wind velocity of 150 km/h.
Older buildings, like the Empire State Building, were built
so that their core withstood all bending stresses. But
structural engineers have since found that by shifting the
bracing and support to the perimeter of a building, it can better
resist high winds. The most advanced buildings are constructed
like a hollow tube, with thin, outer columns spaced tightly
together and welded to broad horizontal beams. Toronto's First
Canadian Place and New York's World Trade Center towers
are all giant, framed tubes.
A superskyscraper would undoubtedly need extra rigidity,
which you could add by bracing its framework with giant diagonal
beams. You'll see this at Chicago's John Hancock Center where the
architect has incorporated diagonal braces right into the look of
the building, exposing five huge X's on each side to public view.
Alternatively, you might design your building like a
broadcasting tower, and tie it to the ground with heavy, sloping
guy wires extending from the four corners of the roof to the
ground. A control mechanism at the end of each cable would act
like a fishing reel, drawing in the cable whenever the sway of
the building caused it to slacken.
Tall buildings also encounter the problem of vortex
shedding, a phenomenon that occurs as the wind swirls around the
front corners of the building, forming a series of eddies or
vortices. At certain wind speeds, these vortices vibrate the
building, threatening to shake it apart. In New York City's
Citicorp Center, engineers have tackled vortex shedding with a
400-tonne concrete block that slides around in a special room on
one of the upper stories. Connected to a large spring and a shock
absorber, and riding on a thin slick of oil, the big block
responds to oscillations of the building by moving in the
opposite direction.
Other ways to disrupt vortex shedding include making several
large portals in the upper part of the tower, through which the
wind passes freely. In New York City's World Trade Center,
vibrations are dampened with special spongelike pads sandwiched
in its structure.
The price tag on a superskyscraper is going to be enormous,
but one way to cut costs is with high-strength concretes.
Ordinary concrete is much cheaper than steel, but lacks steel's
rigidity, and could not withstand the huge burdens in a
superskyscraper. But recent experiments with chemical additives,
called superplasticizers, have whipped up double and triple-
strength concretes that could make superskyscrapers an economic
reality.
Once you've built your superskyscraper, there still remains
the job of servicing it -- providing water, electricity, fire
protection, ventilation and cooling. Servicing also means
controlling stack effect. If you've ever been up in a skyscraper
and heard the wind moaning and whistling by the elevator --
that's stack effect. In any tall building, the difference in
temperature and air pressure between the outside and inside the
structure pushes air up the stairwells and elevators, like
smoke up a chimney. Strong, cold drafts blowing up the building
create heating problems and make it difficult to open doors into
stairwells. To control stack effect, buildings must be as
airtight as possible, with ventilation ducts extending only part
way up the building, and revolving doors at ground level.
The one invention that, above all, has enabled buildings to
climb higher is the elevator. As skyscraper populations have
grown, elevator manufacturers have handled larger loads with
double-decker cars -- one car piggybacking another, with each
one stopping at alternative floors. Another innovation is the sky
lobby system, in which passengers take one car to a floor part
way up the building, and then transfer the next flight up to
another car in the same elevator shaft for the rest of the
journey.
Elevators will probably never move any faster than they do
today,since the human ear can only endure a descent speed of 600
m per minute. So, an elevator ride in a superskyscraper might be
comparable to a subway trip, with several transfer points and
extended waits between cars.
Which brings designers to the inevitable question: Will
office staffs and tenants stand for such long rides? Indeed, will
they tolerate all the other shortcomings of skyscrapers -- the
feelings of entrapment inside them, the dark, windy canyons
between them, and the congested traffic below -- made worse by
higher heights.
Developers now claim they've worked most design bugs out of
the new megastructures Whether or not people will actually want
to occupy them should prove if the sky is really the limit.
Don Valley -- loose deposits of sand and silt overlying deep
deposits of cllay. Soft deposits. -- or is sand cover on top of
clay. terms: loose sand, loose silt, soft clay. Increase
surface area of piles.
Perhaps the most critical servicing job is protecting the
building's occupants from fire and smoke. Today's skyscrapers are
equipped with ultra-sophistated fire-control systems: automatic
sprinklers help douse the fire while exhaust fans suck out the
smoke from burning areas, preventing it from escaping into other
floors and stairwells.
Feeding the sprinkler systems are huge water storage tanks
that sit on the top floor or roof. These are the same tanks that
Paul Newman blew up to douse the rampaging fire in "The Towering
Inferno". Exploding tanks undoubtedly made for exciting climax,
but they could never contain that much water to put out a
skyscraper fire. Built in the early Seventies by I.M. Pei, one
of America's foremost architects, the "John Hancock" towers
majestically over the Back Bay area of Boston. Over time, it
developed the bad habit of letting its windows fall out on windy
days. This problem grew so serious, that police had to cordon off
the leeward side of the skyscraper to keep unsuspecting
pedestrians from getting beaned by falling glass. In fact, the
situation became so dangerous that doormen were escorting workers
in and out of the building during the daily invasion and exodus,
keeping a wet finger to the wind and an eye peeled for falling
glass. And what was the foundation of this perplexing and
disturbing window-popping habit? As it turned out, the foundation
was to blame; it and what is known as Bernoulli's Principle,
(Which states that the pressure of a gas falls as its velocity
increases.)
What happens is this: a light wind comes along and has to
get around a large slab of building. It pushes against the front
of the tower, and then speeds up to get to the edges of the
building so it can keep up with the rest of the wind, (this is
why the areas around tall buildings and groups of tall buildings
become very windy). The back side of the skyscraper, because of
all the fast air on its sides, develops an area of low pressure,
as predicted by Bernoulli's Principle, and because the air
pressure inside the wall is suddenly higher than that outside,
there is the potential for windows blowing out
This is obviously what was happening to Mr. Pei's building;
but why was it happening with such frequency? After all, this
building was becoming a lethal weapon! The search for the
solution would have to start from the ground up, and the design
team began with the history of the site...
As is the case with many cities built beside a body of
water, Boston's downtown area expanded rapidly during the last
century, and its bay was filled in to provide more building
space. Because this land was built on more or less right away,
it didn't have the chance to compact and provide as much support
as land that had been settling for thousands of years.
The design of the "John Hancock" took into consideration the
condition of the soil on which it was built, and the engineers
did their best to allow for settling. What they couldn't
accurately predict was how the building would settle, so they
planned for a uniform settling of the building. Instead, they
found that the building had settled unevenly!
The result of this settling caused an unequal surface
tension on the curtain wall, which, as all curtain walls are, had
been designed only to serve as an envelope for the building, and
to support no weight other than its own. This meant that it was
nearing its maximum strength limit even without any wind blowing
on it. The suction of the low pressure area on the leeward side
of the building caused the wall to billow out and pop windows
like buttons.
The mechanical engineers, realizing that the negative air
pressure was too much for the wall, decided to fight that
negative pressure with negative air pressure of their own. Using
the fact that all skyscrapers are completely sealed, the
perimeter air supply system of the whole building was monitored
with regards to the exterior air pressure, and then air was
supplied or removed to balance the tension on the curtain wall.
Quite literally, they would make the building suck in its
billowing stomach to keep from popping buttons.
Simple, huh?
This tale ends with a moral and with a warning: the moral of the
story is to look up when you're around tall buildings on very
windy days ; the warning (for local folks) is that all the land
south of Front Street is infill!
|